Tag:Curtis Granderson
Posted on: December 8, 2009 3:48 pm
 

MLB Trade Updates

If you have been keeping up with this weeks winter meetings you should have heard about the blockbuster trade of the meetings that has occured. The Yankees aquire Curtis Granderson, the Diamondbacks get Edwin Jackson and Ian Kennedy, and the Tigers get Max Scherzer, Austin Jackson and prospects (I think the D-Backs got some prospects to). The Yankees probably win this trade just because they were in the best shape and improved a minor hole that they had. The Tigers also got a really good deal in my mind, i have always been a fan of Max Scherzer he has great strikout potential and could fit in solidly at number 2. Austin Jackson looks to be a good center field option, but he is a prospect and will have to prove his worth (but the Yankees thought very highly of him). I think the worst part of the deal for Tigers is that they lost such a great clubhouse presense and has such great offensive and deffensive skills. The Diamondbacks seem like they got the short end of the stick, Edwin Jackson has bounced around a lot which can mean questiable character, he wont be under team control as long as Scherzer. He is streaky but when he's on he can be as good if not better than Scherzer. Ian Kennedy can fill that 5th rotation spot or help in the bullpen, but i have never been to crazy on Kennedy just based on what ive seen of him. This trade was a good way to get the winter meetings moving, there had been a lot of talk and finally we got a big trade to talk about. The thing that makes me interested about this trade is what is going to happen to Melky Cabrera. I've heard he could be packaged in a deal for Halladay, or the Cubs may be able to go after him. Im not sure who the Cubs send over there for Cabrera, but that could be extremley benifital to the Cubs. They are in dire need of a Center fielder and he is cheap and young. That is the most important thing the Cubs need to focus on as they move forward, bringing in young players who you can keep around for a while. But as i said before i think the Yankees won this trade with the Tigers gettign a good return and the diamondbacks lossed a little bit.
Posted on: November 16, 2009 8:34 pm
 

Curtis Granderson Anyone?

If you follow baseball at all during the offseason you should know by now that the Tigers are hinting that they will shop Curtis Granderson this offseason along with pitcher Edwin Jackson. Of course the Cubs have come out as the leading contendors for a Granderson trade, so i wanted to take a look at Granderson's value and look at who the Cubs might have to give up to aquire him.
Before we even get started i want to look at his career stat line, .272/.344/.484. Thats way above average for a center fielder, plus the fact that he stole 66 bases over the past 4 years. He is a 30/30 threat with a mediocre batting average. Acording to fangraphs.com Granderson was worth $15.2 mill last season, and over the last 4 years he hasnt been valued at less than 14 mill. His fielding is average, but he is a very durable player, since 06' he hasnt accumulated less than 553 AB in a season. Now last season he had a bit of a down year at the plate hitting a .249/.327/.453 stat line. So his value dipped a little last season, which may make it easier for the Cubs to get him although it will take a lot. That is the big question, who will the Tigers want in return for Granderson, some have mentioned Starlin Castro as the center piece for the trade. But i highly doubt that, as i am pretty sure Hendry has placed him under the untradable category. I wouldnt be suprised to see Josh Vitters included in the trade, possibly Andrew Cashner, Jake Fox, or Micah Hoffpauirr. The Tigers are most likely looking for pieces to replace players like Magglio Ordonez, and Placido Polanco. Mike Fontenot could be a good fit, i guess if i had to make an offer for Granderson this is what i would propose.

Granderson+ 1 mediocre minor leaguer       for          Tyler Colvin, Jake Fox, Mike Fontenot, Jay Jackson


Now im sure there may be a better trade offer that the Tigers would want but i think this offer is equall to what Grandersons actual value is. Colvin played extremly well this season in AA Tennesse and will likely start the year in AAA or be on the Major League roster. His season 09 season was high lighted by a streak of 15 consecutive hits, i believe that set or tied a AA record (I might be wrong). Colvin projects to be a .270 avg 15+ HR guy. He plays average CF defense and could move to a corner spot and play very well. Jake Fox needs no introduction, he has proved to be the Cubs best bench player and should be starting somewhere although he has no real position. The American league would be perfect for him, he could DH, and play the corner positions on occasion. He has .260 AVG  20+ HR potential. He hit .259/.311/.468 in his rookie campaign and was hitting over .400 with 17 bombs in AAA before his call up. Mike Fontenot underachieved in 2009, but he still has the potential to be an above average second baseman. Part of his struggles came from having to fill in at 3rd for Aramis during his injury. Although he did play well defensivly even  with his struggles at the plate. Again he is another player who dosnt really have a spot in Chicago because Jeff Baker seems to have taken over at 2nd. Jay Jackson could be a PTBNL (Player to be named later) but he is an excellent starting pitching prospect. He posted solid numbers in Advanced-A and AA. He is probably 1 to 2 years from the majors but has excellent tools and could be a great starter. I think this would be a great haul for the Tigers and it wouldnt hurt the Cubs at any position really. They have another young CF coming up in Brett Jackson (their 09 draft pick). They have Andrew Cashner as another SP option and they would still hold on to their top 2 prospects in Starlin Castro and Josh Vitters. I think it still favours the Cubs but the Tigers would get immediate returns from Fox and Fontenot and possibly Colvin. I still highly doubt the Tigers are really even shopping Granderson, but its still fun to speculate.  
 
 
 
 
The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com